Saved Results

No results saved yet.

Enter a patient name and hit Save on a result.

Clinical calculator summary

Original 1984 Nine-Criterion Weiss Score

An additive histopathology score using nine microscopic criteria in conventional adrenocortical tumors.

Evidence-based context for fast calculator use

Purpose:
Reproduce the original criterion count and operational threshold without implying a definitive diagnosis or treatment decision.
Population:
Resected conventional adult adrenocortical tumors assessed by an expert pathologist.
Factors:
Nuclear grade, Mitotic count and atypical mitoses, Clear-cell and diffuse architecture percentages, Necrosis and venous, sinusoidal, and capsular invasion
Reference:
Weiss LM. Am J Surg Pathol. 1984;8(3):163-169.
HomeWeiss Score (Adrenal)
Pin your most used calculators here by clicking the star in the dropdown.

Weiss Score (Adrenal)

% of tumor
% of tumor

Clinical Context & Background

This calculator reproduces the original 1984 nine-criterion Weiss system. It assigns one point for each source-defined histologic criterion and reports whether the operational score threshold of three is met.
The result requires expert adrenal-pathology interpretation. Scores 2 and 3 are borderline between benign and malignant behavior, and a score below three is not definitive evidence of benignity. The system is intended for resected conventional adult adrenocortical tumors and is not appropriate for biopsy-only assessment, pediatric tumors, or oncocytic variants. It is not a staging, prognostic, surveillance, or treatment-selection tool.
Formula Logic
Original 1984 nine-criterion Weiss score = one point each for nuclear grade III/IV, mitoses >5 per 50 HPF, atypical mitoses, clear cells <=25%, diffuse architecture >1/3, microscopic necrosis, venous invasion, sinusoidal invasion, and capsular invasion.

Reference Data

Total scoreOperational thresholdImportant caution
0-2Malignancy threshold not metA score below 3 is not definitive evidence of benign behavior; score 2 is borderline
>=3Malignancy threshold metScore 3 is borderline and requires expert pathology review

Clinical Workflow

Use, Interpret, And Continue The Patient Pathway

Expand for workflow guidance, limitations, examples, and related next steps.

When To Use

  • Use after resection of a conventional adult adrenocortical tumor when all nine histologic criteria can be assessed.
  • Enter the exact mitotic count per 50 HPF and unrounded percentages for clear cells and diffuse architecture.

How To Interpret

  • Scores 0-2 do not meet the operational threshold; scores >=3 meet it.
  • Scores 2 and 3 are borderline and warrant expert adrenal-pathology review. A score below 3 is not definitive proof of benign behavior.

What To Do Next

  • Integrate the result with expert pathology review, Ki-67, resection status, stage, imaging, endocrine findings, and multidisciplinary assessment.
  • Use an appropriate variant-specific system for oncocytic tumors rather than the conventional Weiss score.

Limitations

  • Not for biopsy-only assessment, pediatric tumors, or oncocytic adrenocortical tumors.
  • Not a staging, prognostic, surveillance, or treatment-selection tool.
  • Individual histologic criteria require expert interpretation and should not be inferred from incomplete specimens.

Validated Population

Resected conventional adult adrenocortical tumors evaluated histologically.

Exact clear-cell boundary

Clear cells comprising exactly 25% of the tumor meet the original criterion and add one point.

Calculation verification history

Verified
  1. : Production browser revalidation

    • Three source-backed cases passed through all nine visible production criteria at scores 0, borderline threshold 3, and maximum 9.
    • Raw equality behavior remained correct at mitoses 5 versus 6, clear cells 25%, and diffuse architecture below versus above one third.
    • No unexpected N/A, stale control, literal undefined/null value, or browser-console error was observed.
    Download latest production check (Excel)

    Case-level evidence is retained in validation/browser-revalidation/weiss-acc-2026-08-03.json.

  2. : Production browser validation

    • Ten source-backed cases were exercised on the public production route through visible browser controls; 10/10 case records passed their expected-versus-observed assertions across 11 visible submissions.
    • Overall browser status: failed-console. medium: Production emitted minified React error #418 during route loads/reloads used by this run.
    • Case-level inputs, expected and observed results, reset/repeat behavior, failure reproductions, and console evidence are retained in the production-browser evidence record.

    Case-level production evidence is retained in validation/browser-production/weiss-acc.json.

  3. : Browser input adapter corrected and reverified

    • Accepted finite number values already normalized by the shared calculator form while retaining strict malformed-input rejection.
    • No equation, cutoff, unit, classification, or applicability rule changed; calculator-specific verification and the calculator-wide browser-input audit passed.
  4. : Full validation test

    • 768/768 source-rule, threshold, invalid-input, trace, wording, scope, UI/integration, and immutability checks passed, including all 512 binary criterion combinations.
    • No registered master panel calculates the Weiss score; no panel receives inherited verification.
  5. : Calculation and input-contract correction

    • Replaced nine favorable pre-scored defaults and arbitrary Object.values summation with exact raw grade, mitotic-count, percentage, and invasion categories plus strict validation.
    • Preserved clear cells at 25% as positive and diffuse architecture only above one third as positive; removed definitive benign wording and added explicit score 2-3 borderline and variant-scope cautions.

Verification confirms the calculator implementation against the cited model; it is not independent clinical validation, regulatory approval, or medical advice.

Found a possible issue? Report it to improve this calculator

Share This Calculator

Share:

Frequently Asked Questions

Do clear cells exactly at 25% add a point?

Yes. The original publication describes clear cells comprising 25% or less of the tumor.

Is a Weiss score of 2 definitively benign?

No. A score of 2 is borderline and requires expert pathology review; a score below 3 is not definitive evidence of benign behavior.

Can this calculator be used for oncocytic adrenocortical tumors?

No. Oncocytic tumors require an adapted system such as Lin-Weiss-Bisceglia.

Evidence-based oncology decision support. Verify with clinical guidelines.