Saved Results

No results saved yet.

Enter a patient name and hit Save on a result.

Clinical calculator summary

Original 2010 Moore/GOG Cervical Prognostic Index

A five-factor historical prognostic index with equal one-point weights.

Evidence-based context for fast calculator use

Purpose:
Reproduce the source-defined GOG risk grouping and historical cohort outcomes without turning them into treatment advice.
Population:
Adults with measurable stage IVB, persistent, or recurrent cervical carcinoma in a cisplatin-containing combination chemotherapy context.
Factors:
Historical race variable, GOG performance status, Measurable pelvic disease, Prior radiosensitizing chemotherapy, Recurrence or progression within one year
Reference:
Moore et al. Gynecol Oncol. 2010;116(1):44-49.
HomeMoore/GOG Cervical Prognostic Index
Pin your most used calculators here by clicking the star in the dropdown.

Moore/GOG Cervical Prognostic Index

Clinical Context & Background

This calculator implements the original 2010 Moore/Gynecologic Oncology Group prognostic index for adults with stage IVB, persistent, or recurrent measurable cervical carcinoma receiving cisplatin-containing combination chemotherapy. One point is assigned for each of five historical factors: the Black race variable recorded in the GOG dataset, GOG performance status 1-2, measurable pelvic disease, prior radiosensitizing chemotherapy, and first recurrence or progression within one year of diagnosis.
Scores 0-1, 2-3, and 4-5 form low-, mid-, and high-risk groups. Historical derivation-cohort median progression-free survival was 6.34, 4.60, and 2.79 months, and median overall survival was 11.10, 9.17, and 5.49 months, respectively. These are cohort observations from older cisplatin-era trials, not current individualized predictions.
The historical Black/non-Black variable is a social and demographic dataset variable, not a biological determinant. Do not infer it from ethnicity, nationality, ancestry, appearance, or genetic data. The score does not select a regimen, bevacizumab, immunotherapy, or another treatment, and modern outcomes may differ substantially.
Formula Logic
Original 2010 Moore/GOG prognostic index: add 1 point for each of five factors - the historical Black race variable, GOG performance status 1-2, measurable pelvic disease, prior radiosensitizing chemotherapy, and first recurrence or progression within one year of diagnosis. Scores 0-1 are low, 2-3 mid, and 4-5 high.

Reference Data

GroupScoreHistorical median PFS / OS
Low risk0-16.34 / 11.10 months
Mid risk2-34.60 / 9.17 months
High risk4-52.79 / 5.49 months

Clinical Workflow

Use, Interpret, And Continue The Patient Pathway

Expand for workflow guidance, limitations, examples, and related next steps.

When To Use

  • Use only after confirming measurable stage IVB, persistent, or recurrent cervical carcinoma and the historical cisplatin-containing combination treatment context.
  • Use GOG performance status and explicitly assessed source factors; do not infer the race variable.

How To Interpret

  • Scores 0-1, 2-3, and 4-5 map to low, mid, and high historical prognostic groups.
  • Treat PFS and OS values as historical cohort observations rather than personalized forecasts.

What To Do Next

  • Integrate current pathology, imaging, biomarkers, performance status, patient goals, contemporary guidelines, and multidisciplinary review.
  • Do not use the score alone to choose or withhold systemic therapy.

Limitations

  • The model comes from older cisplatin-era GOG trial populations and was predominantly studied in squamous carcinoma.
  • It is not applicable to localized disease, nonmeasurable disease, GOG PS 3-4, pediatric patients, or a different treatment context.
  • The historical race variable has important social, ethical, and transportability limitations.

Validated Population

Adults with measurable stage IVB, persistent, or recurrent cervical carcinoma treated in the source GOG cisplatin-combination trial context.

Calculation verification history

Verified
  1. : Production browser revalidation

    • Three source-backed cases passed through visible production controls at scores 0, 2, and 5 across all risk groups.
    • The former completed-visible-controls rejection was absent; numeric performance-status selections were accepted normally.
    • No unexpected N/A, literal undefined value, stale control, unsupported gauge, or browser-console error was observed.
    Download latest production check (Excel)

    Case-level evidence is retained in validation/browser-revalidation/moore-cervical-2026-08-03.json.

  2. : Local browser remediation verified; production retest pending

    • Updated the compact browser adapter to accept exact numeric select/radio values while preserving the original five-factor engine.
    • Ten local visible-browser cases passed across scores 0-5, low/mid/high groups, outside-population PS, required-field feedback, and reset/repeat behavior.
    • The production finding remains open until deployment and public revalidation.

    Local diagnostic evidence is retained in validation/browser-production/moore-cervical.local-remediation.json.

  3. : Production browser validation found a calculation-path defect

    • Nine of ten planned browser cases failed: every fully completed visible profile across scores 0 through 5 rendered N/A / Invalid Input, and GOG PS 3 also failed its expected not-applicable disposition.
    • A supplemental reproduction confirmed all four radio controls and GOG PS 0 visibly retained their selections immediately before submission, excluding an omitted or stale control as the explanation.
    • Missing-DFI validation and reset clearing passed, but maximum-score and zero-score calculations remained invalid; production also emitted React hydration error #418.

    Exact case-level reproductions are retained in validation/browser-production/moore-cervical.json.

  4. : Input workflow simplified and revalidated

    • Reduced the public form to result-, branch-, unit-, and applicability-changing inputs; removed or consolidated non-scoring, administrative, and duplicate questions.
    • Preserved the verified calculation or report-interpretation logic, thresholds, model version, component logic, and supported result pathways behind strict deterministic adapters.
    • Passed the calculator-specific regression audit, adapter-parity and malformed-input checks, the 144-calculator input-quality audit, and the 43-calculator entry-burden audit.
  5. : Full validation test

    • 256/256 source-factor, exhaustive combination, applicability, malformed-input, UI, trace, wording, report, registry, and isolation checks passed.
    • No registered master panel calculates this Moore/GOG index; no panel receives inherited verification.
  6. : Calculation and input-contract correction

    • Replaced defaulted point-coded inputs and Object.values coercion with eight explicit fields, five equal source factors, strict missing/extra/type validation, and separate not-applicable outcomes.
    • Corrected historical PFS and OS medians, clarified measurable pelvic disease and diagnosis-to-recurrence timing, removed regimen-selection wording, and added limitations for the historical race variable and older treatment era.

Verification confirms the calculator implementation against the cited model; it is not independent clinical validation, regulatory approval, or medical advice.

Found a possible issue? Report it to improve this calculator

Share This Calculator

Share:

Frequently Asked Questions

Does this score choose a chemotherapy or immunotherapy regimen?

No. It reproduces a historical prognostic grouping and does not personalize or select treatment.

How should the race variable be interpreted?

It reproduces the Black/non-Black variable recorded in the historical GOG dataset. It is not a biological determinant and must not be inferred from appearance, ancestry, nationality, ethnicity, or genetic data.

Are the displayed survival medians individual predictions?

No. They are historical derivation-cohort medians from older cisplatin-era trials and may not represent outcomes with current therapy.

Evidence-based oncology decision support. Verify with clinical guidelines.