Saved Results

No results saved yet.

Enter a patient name and hit Save on a result.

Clinical calculator summary

CISNE Febrile Neutropenia Score

A serious-complication score for apparently stable adults with solid tumors and febrile neutropenia.

Evidence-based context for fast calculator use

Purpose:
Refine risk assessment within clinically stable solid-tumor febrile neutropenia
Population:
Apparently stable adults with solid tumors and treatment-related febrile neutropenia
Factors:
ECOG status, COPD, Cardiovascular disease, Mucositis, Monocytes, Stress hyperglycemia
Reference:
Carmona-Bayonas et al., J Clin Oncol. 2015
HomeCISNE Score (Febrile Neutropenia)
Pin your most used calculators here by clicking the star in the dropdown.

CISNE Score (Febrile Neutropenia)

Two points for ECOG 2 or higher.

One point for grade 2 or higher.

cells/µL

One point below 200 cells/µL.

Selects the source-defined glucose threshold.

mg/dL

Two points above 120 mg/dL without diabetes, or at 250 mg/dL or higher with diabetes.

Clinical Context & Background

CISNE predicts serious complications that emerge after an adult with solid-tumor, outpatient-onset febrile neutropenia initially appears clinically stable. It was validated for mild-to-moderate-intensity cytotoxic chemotherapy with anticipated short-duration neutropenia. It is not a mortality model and must not be used alone to select discharge or outpatient treatment.
Formula Logic
CISNE = 2×(ECOG ≥2) + COPD + chronic cardiovascular disease + NCI mucositis grade ≥2 + monocytes <200/µL + 2×(stress hyperglycemia). Stress hyperglycemia: glucose ≥121 mg/dL without diabetes or ≥250 mg/dL with diabetes.

Reference Data

Risk ClassScoreFINITE complication rate
Low Risk01.1%
Intermediate1-26.2%
High Risk3-836%

Clinical Workflow

Use, Interpret, And Continue The Patient Pathway

Expand for workflow guidance, limitations, examples, and related next steps.

When To Use

  • Use only after confirming apparent clinical stability in a patient with a solid tumor and febrile neutropenia.
  • Use only when the patient and clinical setting match the population described for CISNE Febrile Neutropenia Score.

How To Interpret

  • Increasing scores identify greater serious-complication risk; CISNE is not designed to rescue an unstable patient into outpatient care.
  • Interpret thresholds with the entered units, current clinical status, and local guideline context.

What To Do Next

  • Combine with MASCC, sepsis assessment, infection focus, organ function, oral tolerance, support, and reliable follow-up.
  • Document the inputs, result, clinical judgment, and any reason for deviating from the model-guided pathway.

Limitations

  • Do not apply to hematologic malignancy, obvious instability, or as a reason to delay antibiotics.
  • This calculator supports clinical assessment and does not independently prescribe treatment.

Validated Population

Apparently stable adults with solid tumors and treatment-related febrile neutropenia

Clinical example

A patient who appears stable but has ECOG 2, COPD, and mucositis accumulates CISNE risk and should not be considered low risk from appearance alone.

Calculation verification history

Verified
  1. : Production browser revalidation

    • Three source-backed CISNE cases passed through visible production controls at scores 0, 2, and 8.
    • No unexpected N/A, literal undefined value, stale control, unsupported gauge, or browser-console error was observed.
    Download latest production check (Excel)

    Case-level evidence is retained in validation/browser-revalidation/cisne-febrile-neutropenia-risk-index-2026-08-03.json.

  2. : Production browser validation

    • Ten source-backed cases were exercised on the public production route through visible browser controls; 10/10 case records passed their expected-versus-observed assertions across 12 visible submissions.
    • Overall browser status: failed-console. medium: Production emitted minified React error #418 during route loads/reloads used by this run.
    • Case-level inputs, expected and observed results, reset/repeat behavior, failure reproductions, and console evidence are retained in the production-browser evidence record.

    Case-level production evidence is retained in validation/browser-production/cisne-febrile-neutropenia-risk-index.json.

  3. : Public form simplified

    • Combined the six adult, solid-tumor, chemotherapy, confirmed-FN, outpatient-onset, and apparent-stability eligibility questions into one early applicability confirmation.
    • Preserved all seven score determinants, including the diabetes-dependent glucose threshold.
    • The compact adapter projects confirmed applicability into the unchanged strict 13-key engine; the existing six-indicator neutropenia-panel compatibility path remains unchanged.
  4. : Full validation test

    • Passed 67/67 score, threshold, applicability, missing-input, malformed-input, and nonfinite-input checks.
    • Confirmed score range 0-8 and FINITE classes: 0 low, 1-2 intermediate, and 3-8 high.
  5. : Correction

    • Corrected stress hyperglycemia from 1 point to the published 2 points, restoring the maximum score of 8.
    • Added raw ECOG, mucositis, monocyte, glucose, and diabetes inputs with exact published thresholds.
    • Added adult, solid-tumor, outpatient-onset, chemotherapy-context, confirmed-FN, and clinical-stability applicability checks.
    • Removed wording that implied CISNE alone establishes outpatient safety.

    Included in the current validation report.

Verification confirms the calculator implementation against the cited model; it is not independent clinical validation, regulatory approval, or medical advice.

Found a possible issue? Report it to improve this calculator

Share This Calculator

Share:

Frequently Asked Questions

What is CISNE Febrile Neutropenia Score used for?

Refine risk assessment within clinically stable solid-tumor febrile neutropenia. It is intended for apparently stable adults with solid tumors and treatment-related febrile neutropenia.

Does CISNE Febrile Neutropenia Score determine treatment by itself?

No. Confirm the population, inputs, contraindications, competing risks, and current guideline recommendations before acting on the result.

Evidence-based oncology decision support. Verify with clinical guidelines.