Clinical calculator summary
Lymphoma (DLBCL) Prognosis Panel
Clinical calculator summary
Lymphoma (DLBCL) Prognosis Panel
This panel computes five validated prognostic indices for Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) to support clinical decision-making at diagnosis: 1.
Evidence-based context for fast calculator use
- Purpose:
- Combined Classic IPI, NCCN-IPI, aaIPI, CNS-IPI, and R-IPI for Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma.
- Population:
- patients whose clinical question requires the component models displayed in the combined panel
- Factors:
- Age, Ann Arbor Stage, ECOG Performance Status, Number of Extranodal Sites Involved, Patient Serum LDH, Lab Upper Limit of Normalfor LDH, Bone Marrow involvement, CNS involvement
Lymphoma (DLBCL) Prognosis Panel
Clinical Context & Background
Parallel DLBCL prognostic index calculations with separate component classifications; results are compared rather than averaged.Reference Data
| Risk Group | Classic IPI (5y OS) | NCCN-IPI (5y OS) | aaIPI ≤60y / >60y (5y OS) | R-IPI (4y OS) | CNS-IPI (2y CNS relapse) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low | 0-1 (73%) | 0-1 (96%) | 0 (83% / 56%) | 0 (94%) | 0-1 (0.8%) |
| Low-Intermediate | 2 (51%) | 2-3 (82%) | 1 (69% / 44%) | 1-2 (79%) | 2-3 (3.9%) |
| High-Intermediate | 3 (43%) | 4-5 (64%) | 2 (46% / 37%) | — | — |
| High | 4-5 (26%) | 6-8 (33%) | 3 (32% / 21%) | 3-5 (55%) | 4-6 (12%) |
Clinical Workflow
Use, Interpret, And Continue The Patient Pathway
Expand for workflow guidance, limitations, examples, and related next steps.
Clinical Workflow
Use, Interpret, And Continue The Patient Pathway
Expand for workflow guidance, limitations, examples, and related next steps.
When To Use
- Use Lymphoma (DLBCL) Prognosis Panel when combined Classic IPI, NCCN-IPI, aaIPI, CNS-IPI, and R-IPI for Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma.
- Confirm that the patient, diagnosis, disease phase, and available inputs match the cited model before calculation.
How To Interpret
- Interpret the displayed result using the calculator-specific formula and reference table, spanning Low through High.
- A boundary result should prompt input verification and clinical review rather than false precision.
What To Do Next
- Review every component result separately; if models disagree, verify inputs and follow the more cautious disease-specific pathway rather than averaging scores.
- Document the inputs, result, timing, and clinical context so the assessment can be reproduced.
Limitations
- A panel improves comparison but does not make component models interchangeable or create a new validated composite score.
- The result supports clinician judgment and does not independently determine treatment.
Validated Population
patients whose clinical question requires the component models displayed in the combined panel
How to apply this result
For a representative case, verify Age, Ann Arbor Stage, ECOG Performance Status, calculate the result, and confirm that its classification matches the highlighted reference band before continuing the disease-specific pathway.
Related Tools
Frequently Asked Questions
When should Lymphoma (DLBCL) Prognosis Panel be used?
Use it for patients whose clinical question requires the component models displayed in the combined panel when all required inputs and the intended clinical setting are confirmed.
Can Lymphoma (DLBCL) Prognosis Panel determine treatment by itself?
No. Interpret the result with the cited evidence, complete clinical assessment, current guidelines, and patient-specific goals.
Evidence-based oncology decision support. Verify with clinical guidelines.