Saved Results

No results saved yet.

Enter a patient name and hit Save on a result.

HR+ / HER2− Breast Cancer: Treatment Guidelines

Complete evidence-based treatment algorithms for hormone receptor-positive breast cancer — neoadjuvant ICI, adjuvant CDK4/6i, metastatic biomarker-directed therapy, ADCs, surgery/RT de-escalation, and brain mets.

NCCN 2.2026ESMO Living GuidelinesmonarchE · NATALEE · INAVO120KEYNOTE-756 · DB06 · TROPiCS-02Last reviewed: Apr 2026

monarchE OS HR

0.842

7-yr: First CDK4/6i OS benefit

INAVO120 PFS

15.0 mo

vs 7.3 mo (HR 0.43)

KEYNOTE-756 pCR

24.3%

vs 15.6% (Pembro + NACT)

HER2-Low/Ultralow

~85%

HR+ MBC T-DXd eligible

HR+ / HER2− Breast Cancer: Epidemiology, Biology, and Treatment Framework

HR+ Prevalence

~70%

Of all breast cancers

5-yr OS (Stage I-III)

>90%

Early stage HR+

Late Recurrence Risk

~15%

Years 5–20 (Luminal A)

ESR1 Mx (After AI)

30–40%

Acquired AI resistance

Luminal A Phenotype

  • Grade 1–2, Ki-67 ≤20%, ER-high (>10%), PR+
  • Low Oncotype DX (RS 0–25) or MammaPrint Low
  • Excellent prognosis; ET alone often sufficient
  • Late recurrence risk extends beyond 5 years

Luminal B Phenotype (High-Risk)

  • Grade 3, Ki-67 >20–30%, ER-low (1–10%)
  • High Oncotype DX (RS ≥26) or MammaPrint High
  • Node-positive (N1–N3)
  • Benefits from CDK4/6i ± chemotherapy
Adjuvant
monarchE (7-yr update): FIRST adjuvant CDK4/6i with proven OS benefit; HR 0.842; 7-yr iDFS 77.4% vs 70.9%
Adjuvant
NATALEE (4–5 yr): Ribociclib 400mg × 3yr; iDFS HR 0.72; broader Stage II–III including N0 high-risk
Neoadjuvant
KEYNOTE-756: Pembrolizumab + NACT: pCR 24.3% vs 15.6%; 2026 standard for Grade 3 Stage II–III
Metastatic 1L
INAVO120: Inavolisib triplet: PFS 15.0 vs 7.3 mo (HR 0.43); OS 34.0 vs 27.0 mo (HR 0.67, p=0.02)
ADC
DESTINY-Breast06: T-DXd for HER2-low AND ultralow; PFS 13.2 vs 8.1 mo; ~85% HR+ eligible
Adjuvant
lidERA (SABCS 2025): Giredestrant oral SERD superior to AI in adjuvant; HR 0.70; NCCN 2A option
Surgery/RT
FAST-Forward (10yr): 26 Gy/5 fractions (1 week) = gold standard WBI; LR 2.0% vs 3.6%

Clinical reference only. These guidelines are intended to support, not replace, clinical judgment. Treatment decisions should be individualised based on patient-specific factors, local protocols, and multidisciplinary team input. Always apply clinical judgment and consult local institutional guidelines where applicable. Data reflect published literature as of April 2026.